Open Letter: Questions about Microsoft Corp. Intellectual Property

Posted by hkwint on Nov 17, 2006 11:36 AM EDT
LXer.com; By H. Kwint
Mail this story
Print this story

In a question-and-answer session after his keynote speech at the Professional Association for SQL Server (PASS) conference in Seattle last Thursday, [Steve] Ballmer said "Linux[™]"uses our [Microsoft Corp.] intellectual property" and "Microsoft Corp. wanted to "get the appropriate economic return for our shareholders from our innovation."
Now, as a Linux user and editor of a Linux users site, I have some questions about this remarks.

[ I sent the thing to WagEdds Rapid Response Team, look forward to hearing from them - hkwint ]

A lot of Linux users (possibly SUSE users already, or in the future) probably want to know more about this, because they might be afraid to infringe upon intellectual property which belongs to Microsoft, which is a thing they may not want to do.
The questions I ask here, also seem important to Microsoft Corp. shareholders, it seems to me, and I believe they have the right to see answers to this questions.

1) When speaking about intellectual property, what is meant? It can't be copyright, since almost all Microsoft Corp. software is closed source, which means people who haven't got access to the code can't have infringed the copyright. Moreover, copyright infringement would be easy to prove, since most of what Steve Ballmer calls "Linux" is open source. Therefore, can 'intellectual property' be put on par with 'software patents'?

2) Since the general believe is software patents aren't enforceable in (amongst others) Europe, does this mean Microsoft doesn't have any Intellectual Property from an European perspective? For the shareholders Steve Ballmer was talking about, this would be very important information.

3) Why does Microsoft Corp. never specify which Intellectual Property Linux infringes on? Is this because Microsoft Corp. doesn't know, is it because Microsoft Corp. is afraid its Intellectual Property isn't enforceable, or is there any other good reason for this?
Why doesn't Microsoft Corp. tell to its shareholders for which Intellectual Property Microsoft wanted to "get the appropriate economic return"? This is important information for the shareholders.

4) If Linux infringes on the Intellectual Property, why hasn't Microsoft already tried to "get the appropriate economic return for [the] shareholders from [Microsoft Corp.] innovation." earlier? The shareholders could already have gotten the appropriate economic return for their investments already if Microft Corp. would have taken action, don't they?

I and my readers, and probably a lot of shareholders, look forward to receiving your answers.

Thanks in advance,



-- H. Kwint

LXer.com editor

Note: Since this is an open letter, it wil be published at our site.

_______________________________

About LXer.com:

LXer (www.LXer.com) is a fully independent news and opinion site, established in January 2004, by Linux veteran Dave Whitinger, a well-known personality in the free and open source software community.

LXer is one of the fastest growing Linux news and opinion sites on the globe. People turn to LXer for its readable, often updated news feed and comments. Over 400,000 unique users from 165 countries visit LXer each month, and LXer is syndicated by Google. CIOs, CTOs, government officials, as well as programmers, system administrators and end users make up our very active community.

Our top quality editors create, edit, and present information about GNU/Linux and free/open source software via our frequently-updated newswire. You can visit our Staff page (http://lxer.com/team.php) to learn more about us.

For contact, please mail to [e-mail:editors _at_ lxer _dot_ com]

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial, LXer Features; Groups: Community, GNU, Linux, Microsoft, SUSE

« Return to the newswire homepage

Subject Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
good questions but... purplewizard 0 2,143 Nov 18, 2006 2:52 AM

You cannot post until you login.