Showing headlines posted by schestowitz

So it looks like it's actually underway already, with the implicit blessing of the originator of the DFSG and the Open Source Definition (he co-founded the OSI and no longer trusts the OSI).

What if we told you that the person who pushes Rust into Ubuntu (to replace GNU) comes from the Army, where he worked on mass surveillance, according to himself? He later went into the same industry the former CEO of Canonical had come from. His Web site says that he: "Architected and built multiple high-end bespoke Electronic Surveillance capabilities."

It should be noted that the Rust language is being developed by the Mozilla Foundation, which is the same organization that is presently turning Firefox into a spyware monster that sends all data about its users somewhere to train "AI".

As we'll show later, many people (even inside OSI) are very angry at the OSI right now

Excuse me, can I make a complaint, OSI? Or are you paid to excuse "Open Source" violations by Microsoft?

If it's just some category or section in forums, then it's not a blog. No more "Community Blog".

We like the part where RMS says "the name OpenAI is deceptive because it's not artificial intelligence. It's an LLM. They should change their name to OpenLLM. And then they should change their name to SecretLLM because they don't publish the code at all. So the name OpenAI is two lies."

In general the most hardworking UEFI advocates seem to be people who don't do stuff like install alternative operating systems on their computers. They certainly don't write computer code that would have something to do with the motherboard's firmware or interface with the peripheral devices.

At the moment things are still tense; we deal with violent Microsoft con jobs (American citizens) and their "hired guns from London" sending unauthorised and totally inappropriate messages to our lawyer, basically trying to not only threaten but also spy

"If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither on your side, pound the table."

Microsoft is in a rather dire situation and the last thing it needs right now is legitimate critics

Can this even be called "revisionism"? This is pure fabrication - in fact fabrication that can ruin the reputation of Linux.

Regarding the DDoS attacks, that's an open secret

Who decided to put Microsoft brands in the interfaces?

Since FSF-EEE is basically a front that speaks for Microsoft, Google, Intel (i.e. USA) etc. it's about time for a rebrand

"IBM is infiltrated to the point they are promoting and trying to use Microsoft Entra (formerly Azure Active Directory, a proprietary ripoff of Kerberos)."

So the pattern seems increasingly clear; a lot of anti-Linux 'articles' are made by bots. Is that Microsoft's ChatGPT?

Beware false headlines and fake text from cybersecuritynews.com and gbhackers.com. Those sites with their false headlines are being spread around by Google News. They often spread anti-Linux messages, set aside text manipulation that turns facts into lies.

Is BetaNews finally taking these problems more seriously?

10,000+ US dollars a week even without campaigning for funds