Showing headlines posted by schestowitz

The behviour of Canonical and Red Hat reminds us that community-led distros are important and we must not let companies like Canonical and Red Hat (or oligarchs like Mark Shuttleworth) become flag bearers

At the end of March of this year a Microsoft employee made a ton of noise about Xz when the real security blunder was an imminent (days away) report about Microsoft as a whole suffering a breach, impacting the US government and resulting in espionage (the US government then published a scathing report about why it was Microsoft's fault).

The promise or the commitment (IBM and OSI said they would continue OpenSource.com at OpenSource.net) hasn't lasted even a year (or just a little over a year).

It has often been said, and moreover articulated accurately, that software projects that refuse to collaborate (actively hostile towards outside contributions or contributions from the outside) are to be avoided

LLMs not only ruin the Web. They ruin the planet.

Freedom is not something you can legally pursue or accomplish when it is "too late", i.e. when everything is already proprietary or when you live under a dictatorship

To us, the Linux Foundation is just a massive scam. It calls itself "Linux", but only about 2% of its budget is devoted to Linux.

If Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt (FUD) tactics and fear-mongering/dramatisation can determine election outcomes (FUD is spread fastest in social control media), it can also affect people's choice of operating systems and/or purchases

The bottom line is, most cheaters use Windows. EA is waging a war on technical people but instead of acknowledging the real issue it blames "Linux"

Linux Foundation is the new Outercurve (Microsoft), an infiltrated and undermined institution (they try to do the same to the FSF)

“The Linux Foundation provides a neutral, trusted home for developers to collaborate on open software projects” (yes, "open software").

I worked in several universities (about 4 different roles) and I kept seeing the 'Windowsheads' doing their damage, sometimes with "special guests" from Microsoft UK.

THINGS are not exactly improving. Linux affairs are just getting less transparent.

As per his site, and as noted the other day as well, Dr. Stallman should start giving talks tomorrow (Universidad Nacional de Cañete)

In short, there's some dodgy private company trying to promote itself by trash-talking "Linux" for over 10 days already (many shallow pieces in "the media"). But it's not about Linux, it's about servers that haven't been patched for ages and it's the fault of some outdated programs installed on them.

Remember that Microsoft keeps close to its chest the operations and finances of GitHub (because it's embarrassing!), so we must rely on leaks and/or whistleblowers

So the Linux Foundation devotes about 2% of its budget to Linux (which it's named after) and the above is what it does in practical terms (PR for Bill Gates).

It's also clear that some "journalists" cannot tell the difference between Git and GitHub (Linux is not developed in GitHub), so they are clearly out of their ballpark.

"Git will go away sooner than later"

Microsoft loves to use GitHub, which is proprietary, as an example of being "open"; not only Microsoft does this