Showing headlines posted by Herschel_Cohen
« Previous ( 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 9 ) Next »Firefox security (Really Windows Security or Lack Thereof - ED)
[ED: Oh, the horror - well this really is more about the lack of Windows IE security than the supposed object of interest. In physics scattering probability from a given nucleus is measure in terms of "barns" that if compared to the content here would be strictly proportional to the physical size and packing density, i.e. size of the program and how dense the number of targets in use on the internet. In nuclear physics and here too on a more mundane topic the interactions are much more complex than simple a priori probability. To be a worthwhile target in the case of a browser it must allow a pathway to either control or damage the target system, hence, even were the numbers reduced the integration of IE directly to the OS makes it still a more tempting target. Moreover, being more easily compromised just adds to its inherent attractiveness.
So if you like to read why IE, Windows are not inherently at fault, this is a simple minded article for you - HC]
HP server exec leaves for Linux firm
[ED: CEO of Penguin and Nist are both from Tandem that was purchased by HP. Another big Unix to Linux move? - HC]
Apparmor for Linux goes open-source
[ED: Repeat, yes but it's Novell and they are so much better than I expected - HC]
Study: 40% of Irish companies choose open-source
[ED: Much less significant than the raw numbers might seem to imply. Within the EU Ireland is a friend of patents and MS goals. Hence, I would bet many of the companies and entities just do not carry the clout of 40% usage should imply due to many being small or not politically well connected. - HC]
Older Hardware, Windows and Linux
[ED: Just one more instance where a Microsoft "Get The Facts", is overly selective of the facts - what do you expect the truth? Well you can't handle the truth! They are just trying to protect you. - HC]
Microsoft Touts Windows On Linux Site
Driver education for Linux novices
[ED: So be polite. if you cannot be helpful yourself do something better than "RTFM" that is known to have endeared many new users to Linux. Stories like this will do more to get some to try to escape miind control. So just remember the problems you had as a newbie or turn them over to someone less skilled than yourself that has social skills that you lack - HC]
Winning the Linux Wars
"Raising the caution flag:
Linux is still a maturing platform, and with youth comes uncertainty. "The [Microsoft] value proposition is always a good sell, but it doesn't hurt to back that up with a really long hard look at what the risk factors are," notes Tim Beamer, technology ... "
[ED: Be assured Windows is rock solid, and when it's not it gets fixed, and when it's fixed late it's fixed mostly right, and when it's not right it's done over until it's done right! Who could ask for anything more? Windows is a mature insecure system. It will be even better when it's fixed per incident fee - HC]
"Competing with Linux once filled Microsoft partners with dread, but now many are taking on the open source operating system with growing self-confidence -- and success. Here are the tactics for winning the fight."
[ED: Even here they note they are not winning every battle, so they buck up the troops letting know of all the Linux shortcomings and how they can Win with Win(dows). They cite some big independent sources, e.g. Gartner, etc. It's always good to know your enemies plans - HC]
How one reviewer approaches the art of reviewing
I've been receiving a fair amount of e-mail from people who are sure that I don't know Linux, but their notes are really showing me that they don't know reviewing. I don't hold that against them. Few people know how reviews really work.
Read on.
Red Hat rebuts CERT vulnerability figures
[ED: Pretty good write up with a nice ending - HC]
"You should look at the number of critical vulnerabilities. It's a better comparison to look at the critical vulnerabilities that affect customers due to the platform they use. There are fewer critical vulnerabilities, and they are fixed faster in Red Hat Linux," said Cox.
"There is also the issue of timing. With Linux products, critical updates are available within a day. If you look at Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, the average patch time is under a day. With the recent critical WMF (Windows Meta File) vulnerability, it took Microsoft seven days."
Microsoft was not available for comment at the time of writing.
Temporary CIO Steps into Mass. OpenDoc War
[ED: This is an evolving story where some ID* is really needed - HC]
[* ID == "Intelligent Decisions"]
Quest Software picks up AfterMail
[ED: Here is the key phrase that perhaps make this item have some significance - HC]
" ... archiving email data to make it more accessible to knowledge workers and adhere to corporate compliance regulations."
Firefox Soars and Apple's Safari Jumps as 2005 Browser Share Race ...
"NetApplications, ... measure, monitor and market Web sites for Small to Medium Enterprises (SME)"
[ED: Meaning they measure a fraction of the total market and of that fraction - what portion they have as clients that are measured? How random is its subset or how typical are its clients are unaddressed issues, hence, these are near meaningless numbers to advertise themselves without the slightest nod towards statistical error. If you believe these figures, we need to talk business (I really have a sure money making proposition for you on the East Coast ...)- HC]
Regarding marketing see the lower portion of this article: "HitsLink(tm) is NetApplications' flagship product, providing advanced website statistics and analysis for webmasters and eMarketers alike."
DCC Alliance 'close to end' claims Ubuntu founder
[ED: More extensive explanation of the reasoning behind this conclusion than I have seen elsewhere - HC]
The Print Shop: Linux Drivers Made Easy
Essentially this is a mini review where Cups now stands.
OOo Off the Wall: Find and Replace
Nice set of images for easy to follow instructions with some depth on structured searches.
Linux vs. Windows security
[ED: A reasonably worded look at some security issues pertaining to both systems - HC]