SVN on TNT
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| the_doctor Oct 09, 2014 3:24 PM EDT |
Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols was interviewed on Tech News Today about this story. Skip ahead to time index 13:50 for the start of his segment. |
| seatex Oct 09, 2014 4:26 PM EDT |
So, they are trying to sell businesses on $50/month per Chromebook with free replacements when needed. I'm willing to bet there's some fine print with limitations on how often this can be done. And, at $50/month, that's $600/yr. I traveled all over the country for 13 years with laptops and probably had to replace them every 2-3 years. Since a functional laptop goes for $500 or less these days and has better storage and desktop replacement functionality, I don't think this is such a great deal. But, if Like Steven J. Vaughan, you have just conceded to storing everything in cloud servers and said to heck with privacy, maybe you won't mind this so much. Personally, I would rather still be responsible for the data on my laptop. I'm also a bit biased, as I'm not a Chromebook fan. |
| penguinist Oct 09, 2014 4:50 PM EDT |
I'm a big advocate of the Cloud... provided... that it runs on MY server where I have control. I find it hard to imagine that responsible business leaders will be willing to put their employee's data on a server that their company does not control (sorry Google). |
| cr Oct 09, 2014 6:19 PM EDT |
> I find it hard to imagine that responsible business leaders will be willing to put their employee's data on a server that their company does not control (sorry Google). I think the Mega scandal is a big wakeup on that. If you're not worried about your private data getting loose, you should be worried about losing it outright just as collateral damage. As long as Hollywood-Dot-Gov can get away with being the Cyber-Highwaymen Patrol, nobody's stuff is safe unless it's at home. |
| penguinist Oct 09, 2014 11:55 PM EDT |
Amen |
| 750 Oct 10, 2014 7:11 AM EDT |
@penguinist Err, i would not bet on it. Right now there is a trend of pr quarter cost cutting. And cloud computing is a big enough buzz word that Red Hat has officially announced that it will their focus going forward. And if you can rent space from a third party, and cut your admin staff etc, never mind not dealing with the depreciation of value on the computers, the CEO that approves it will be seen as a golden boy by the shareholders. Also, corporations have in house lawyers. This means that if Google mess up and cause data loss, they are going to bleed money. |
| Bob_Robertson Oct 10, 2014 8:47 AM EDT |
The place I work has all their email farmed out, and I am loathe to think about what a cracker could get just by putting a sniffer on the line 'cause I'm certain it's not encrypted. Anyway, people will figure this out eventually. I'm with the Penguinista, if I have "cloud", is internal. Anything backed up off-site is encrypted _first_. |
| maxxedout Oct 10, 2014 10:37 AM EDT |
@750 Do you honestly believe Google would leave themselves open to a law suite? Their ToS and EULA will contain language, much like all of MS EULAs, that precludes getting sued. |
| 750 Oct 10, 2014 11:17 AM EDT |
@maxxedout Not a suit, but a contract clause hammered in place by company lawyers. |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!