It's GIMP. Not The GIMP.
|
Author | Content |
---|---|
tuxchick Dec 14, 2013 2:35 AM EDT |
And Pixlr is neither open source nor free software, and doesn't have anything to do with Linux. Except that it works in Web browsers on Linux. |
Steven_Rosenber Dec 14, 2013 2:30 PM EDT |
(The) GIMP needs a name change worse than anything except maybe Gigolo. Luckily I really don't need Gigolo anymore since Thunar has improved so much in recent releases. But (The) GIMP? As always, its insistence on obliterating IPTC data in JPGs remains problematic. |
DrGeoffrey Dec 14, 2013 4:39 PM EDT |
Yeahbut, Gigolo is just so descriptively accurate. |
notbob Dec 15, 2013 1:35 PM EDT |
> its insistence on obliterating IPTC data in JPGs remains problematic. Yabut ....http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTUwNjY C'mon gang, cut GIMP some slack. It'll get there. Sure, it's not PS, but it's a whole lot cheaper. |
Steven_Rosenber Dec 15, 2013 5:56 PM EDT |
> Yabut ....http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTUwNjY Free software-wise, you have made my quarter-year! (Can't take glory away from Xfce and Liferea). I am excited, for sure. |
AwesomeTux Dec 16, 2013 3:17 AM EDT |
It is "the GIMP" in most cases, neither way is official though (they don't say one way or the other I believe.) In proper English, however -- depending on how you structure your sentence -- "the GIMP" is most accurate simply because the program's actual name is *the* GNU Image Manipulation Program, and so wherever the full name would be used prefaced with "the" so should the acronym. For example: Quoting:This is the official GIMP web site. Would be: Quoting:This is the official GNU Image Manipulation Program web site. And: Quoting:Extensions are separate processes that communicate with the GIMP in the same way that plug-ins do. Would be: Quoting:Extensions are separate processes that communicate with the GNU Image Manipulation Program in the same way that plug-ins do. |
Steven_Rosenber Dec 16, 2013 11:39 PM EDT |
It isn't GIMP without the 'The.' Though they are free to change the name entirely. |
caitlyn Dec 19, 2013 5:03 AM EDT |
You know what? I don't care what the name is or if they change it slightly. It's an awesome program that probably does 90%+ of what Photoshop does and does it very well indeed at zero cost with open source code. |
skelband Dec 19, 2013 2:17 PM EDT |
@caitlyn: Agreed The most recent versions are pretty awesome. I use it all the time. Does everything I want. |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!