3.12 Kernel Build question
|
Author | Content |
---|---|
Bob_Robertson Nov 04, 2013 11:15 AM EDT |
Ok. So I built both the 3.11.7 and 3.12.0 kernels this morning, and there turns out to be a substantial difference. The 3.11 gave me the usual "image", "headers", "libc", and "firmware" .deb packages. 3.12 provided an additional .deb package: === 33055406 Nov 4 09:52 linux-image-3.12.0_1.bob_i386.deb 517423674 Nov 4 09:58 linux-image-3.12.0-dbg_1.bob_i386.deb === Interesting! A "dbg" image, in addition to the kernel image. The kernel image packages I build by hand are huge, some 450MB, but they seem to contain lots that is not bothered with on install because the actual files in /boot aren't out of line. So what's up here? Anyone else adventurous this morning and know what's going on? |
vainrveenr Nov 04, 2013 11:47 AM EDT |
Quoting:So what's up here? Anyone else adventurous this morning and know what's going on? A matter tangentially related to this 3.12 Kernel Build question is discovering when the 14.1 release of the renown Slackware distro -- with its 3.10.17 kernel -- will be readily available for download. According to the 14.1 'ANNOUNCE' description at one of Slackware's major mirrors http://mirrors1.kernel.org/slackware/slackware-current/ANNOUNCE.14_1 : Quoting:Here are some of the advanced features of Slackware 14.1: While this announcement came out this past weekend, the actual Slackware 14.1 ISO downloads have not yet been fully rolled out. In past releases, distro maintainer Volkerding has made current kernels available soon after major releases. A possible 3.11.x or 3.12.x kernel for Slackware 14.1 ?? |
notbob Nov 04, 2013 4:31 PM EDT |
> A possible 3.11.x or 3.12.x kernel for Slackware 14.1 ?? Current (pre-release) ChangeLog for x86 (32-bit) Mon Nov 4 02:38:43 UTC 2013 testing/source/config-testing-3.12/*: Added. +-------------------------------------------------+ |
jdixon Nov 04, 2013 5:42 PM EDT |
See what happens when I'm traveling over the weekend. Someone should post it to the queue, btw. No reason to let Ubuntu have all the press. |
gus3 Nov 04, 2013 6:03 PM EDT |
Well, the announcement is in there, but the file tree still has no slackware*-14.1 directories. So, it isn't official yet. |
vainrveenr Nov 05, 2013 5:46 PM EDT |
Quoting:Well, the announcement is in there, but the file tree still has no slackware*-14.1 directories. So, it isn't official yet. Additionally, the Slackware Linux Store still specifies the impending 14.1 release as a Pre-Order as of this writing. |
notbob Nov 05, 2013 7:23 PM EDT |
Geez, I wondered where the heck I posted that. ;) Jes a guess, but it might be that's why it's announced as "pre-release" |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!