Seems like RHEL was the impetus for Gnome Classic
|
Author | Content |
---|---|
slacker_mike Jun 13, 2013 9:10 AM EDT |
What I found most interesting about this article was the implication that Gnome "Classic Mode" seems to have been pushed from RHELs side more than the "we've listened to our users feedback" explanation that has been presented in other articles I have read.Quoting:Denise Dumas: We introduced a classic mode [to Fedora 19] which, if you're comfortable with Gnome 2, you're going to find classic mode a no-brainer. |
notbob Jun 13, 2013 9:16 AM EDT |
Not surprising, as RH debuted Gnome beta on RH 5.0. Hasn't it been their baby all along? |
slacker_mike Jun 13, 2013 10:41 AM EDT |
What I found surprising is that RHEL pushed for the Classic Session, which means they didn't like their baby in it's natural or default form. So yeah Gnome has always been RH's baby which is why it is interesting that they didn't default to Gnome Shell seeing as the primary development of GS has been by RH developers. |
jdixon Jun 13, 2013 11:29 AM EDT |
> What I found surprising is that RHEL pushed for the Classic Session,,, They know what their customers will want, and they don't want upset customers. That's one of the problems with open source, the monetary feedback mechanism between the developers and users doesn't exist. So projects people are perfectly happy with (KDE3, Gnome2) can be readily abandoned by the developers. |
notbob Jun 13, 2013 12:38 PM EDT |
The problem with developers is they jes gotta develope, whether it's desired ot not. No such thing as reaching maturity and resting on laurels. Let's see, what else can we add? Got plenty of room for bloat! ;) |
JaseP Jun 20, 2013 3:36 PM EDT |
RHEL pushing for classic mode is a no-brainer... all their implementation and support stuff, including exam prep/training stuff, is all based on the classic Gnome desktop. |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!