Solution
|
Author | Content |
---|---|
tracyanne Jan 25, 2013 6:49 PM EDT |
The Companies should become more competitive by moving to Linux and Free Open Source Software. |
caitlyn Jan 25, 2013 6:51 PM EDT |
If the software they need for their industry exists in the FOSS world. That's usually the problem for business: they often depend on something highly specialized that only runs on Windows. But, yeah... cutting corners this way is stupid and if they could use FOSS they should have done. This assumes, of course, they even know what FOSS or Linux is. |
djohnston Jan 26, 2013 12:08 AM EDT |
There's something being overlooked here. The suit is over an Indian company and a Chinese company violating a California law. I wasn't aware private companies in a foreign country are subject to California laws. Does it also work the other way around? What if a California company violates an Indian or Chinese law? Yes, I realize the issue is supposedly over pirated proprietary software. But, that should be dealt with within India and China, and by the software vendors' vultures lawyers. The premise for this lawsuit is even more preposterous than many "intellectual property" suits. I could go into a lengthy diatribe concerning the constraints on production by overtaxation and overregulation, but ... Citizen's arrest! Citizen's arrest! TOS! TOS! |
BernardSwiss Jan 26, 2013 2:36 AM EDT |
When the legal framework behind this was being pushed a while ago, it was remarked by some that this really a covert trade protectionism ploy. |
henke54 Jan 26, 2013 4:37 AM EDT |
@djohnston and BernardSwiss : I found it also 'weird', because when this is being 'pushed', then 'all gates are closed' in the US, for import of products from all over the world, where there is some 'pirated' software used ? ... lol ... |
nmset Jan 26, 2013 4:40 AM EDT |
But what is being violated ? What software ? What licences ? On what arguments ? In what jurisdiction ? The whole planet is under California control ? Baseless article, just noise, woke me up ! |
henke54 Jan 26, 2013 4:44 AM EDT |
Quoting:"Companies across the globe should be on notice that they will be held accountable in California for stealing our intellectual property," Harris said.http://www.indianexpress.com/news/california-ag-kamala-harri... Quoting:The complaints also allege that these companies obtain an unfair advantage because they can redirect money saved by using pirated software to hire employees and to expand their facilities and their research and development efforts. Furthermore, American companies that are developing software, particularly software that is used in the garment industry, are discouraged from investing in new technology and products if they know their software will be used illegally, the attorney general said.http://www.metnews.com/articles/2013/harr012513.htm |
pmpatrick Jan 26, 2013 9:51 AM EDT |
Quoting:I wasn't aware private companies in a foreign country are subject to California laws.They aren't unless they want to sell their products in California. Also, the complaint alleges that both companies are in violation of their own country's local law regarding pirating software and thereby gain a competitive advantage against California manufacturers. The remedy sought is to bar these manufacturers from selling products in California. A more interesting legal question is whether the California state law is preempted by superseding federal law, i.e. can each state impose its own trade regulations which are more onerous than those imposed by federal law. |
djohnston Jan 26, 2013 8:05 PM EDT |
Quoting:The remedy sought is to bar these manufacturers from selling products in California. Well, I missed that part. It must have been in an external link. Anyway, that seems to me to be the most rational remedy. Quoting:A more interesting legal question is whether the California state law is preempted by superseding federal law, i.e. can each state impose its own trade regulations which are more onerous than those imposed by federal law. That's a Constitutional question, which is the supreme law of the land, and is out of bounds for discussion on this forum. ;^) |
caitlyn Jan 28, 2013 11:26 AM EDT |
Also note that both companies have offices in California and are licensed to do business in the state. The jurisidiction over those offices at least is clear. |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!