Theo de Raadt's nutshell summary...
|
Author | Content |
---|---|
BernardSwiss Jun 13, 2012 3:47 AM EDT |
Quoting: http://www.mail-archive.com/misc@openbsd.org/msg112931.html |
tuxchick Jun 13, 2012 10:47 AM EDT |
It took some time, but that thread finally veered into usefulness (how to boot large drives). I was hoping Theo, or anyone, had something useful to say about the alleged perils of UEFI, but they're sadly shy of details. I just wrote up my own analysis of UEFI and Secure Boot for Linux.com, which should appear soon. |
Steven_Rosenber Jun 13, 2012 11:30 AM EDT |
I'm thinking that on systems built to be servers, either there will be no UEFI, or it will permit installation of non-Windows OSes, because there really isn't much of a server market for Windows. I'm pretty sure this will be hackable as well ... |
Fettoosh Jun 13, 2012 1:15 PM EDT |
Quoting:I'm thinking that on systems built to be servers, either there will be no UEFI, or it will permit installation of non-Windows OSes Besides, MS knows pretty well that OEMs will not go along with its strategy to block Linux on servers because it counts a good share of their server business. That gets me thinking, Why MS is so much worried about the desktop when it maintains claiming it dominates? Is it an emptive attempt at something they see happening that we don't? Like an upward trend in Linux shares on the desktop! |
tuxchick Jun 13, 2012 3:02 PM EDT |
UEFI Secure Boot: Big Hassle, Questionable Benefit linux.com/learn/tutorials/588498-uefi-secure-boot-big-hassle-questionable-benefit |
Fettoosh Jun 13, 2012 7:44 PM EDT |
Very Good article TC. |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!