Oh, No!
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| NoCaDrummer May 07, 2009 2:29 PM EDT |
Say it isn't so!!! There must be some mistake! Microsoft is a poor, benevolent, standards-compliant company, only interested in the good of the public! How could anyone accuse them of monopolistic practices? I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you! (And if you believe that, I've got some land I'd like to sell you.) |
| Sander_Marechal May 07, 2009 2:45 PM EDT |
I'll trade you that land for a bridge ;-) |
| TxtEdMacs May 07, 2009 2:55 PM EDT |
Sorry Sander, I have not yet agreed to terms on my leasing a fraction of the infra structure I control on the East Coast of the U..S. So please back off for now until we agree on our transaction. Remember I only lease, no sale. So you are my representative just like SCO was to Novell on Unix. Same deal understood? YBT |
| TxtEdMacs May 07, 2009 3:00 PM EDT |
[serious tags] Sorry I am NOT going RTFA, however, this might not be as clear cut as presented. For instance, MS is already in a sticky situation with the EU on this very issue due to past behaviour. Has everyone forgotten the discussions on how MS might be forced to offer a listing of potential browsers upon loading the OS? I do not remember that being resolved or disappearing. Another factor, the Register will always push snark over the facts not that I find that overly troublesome, but some people get confused. YBT |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!