good article ... but security=share is not recommended
|
Author | Content |
---|---|
hughesjr Nov 29, 2008 7:03 AM EDT |
Good article, but security=share is not recommded: This is from the RHEL documentation concerning security=share in a smb.conf file: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 14.4.2. Share-Level Security With share-level security, the server accepts only a password without an explicit username from the client. The server expects a password for each share, independent of the username. There have been recent reports that Microsoft Windows clients have compatibility issues with share-level security servers. Samba developers strongly discourage use of share-level security. --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!