same FUD, different day
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| tuxchick Oct 18, 2008 8:46 PM EDT |
You don't need an "IP agreement" to use or contribute to FOSS code. What a bunch of egg-sucking double-talking bald-faced shameless dog-kicking orphan-slapping lying weiners. |
| techiem2 Oct 18, 2008 8:59 PM EDT |
And once again they point to Novell as proof that the world would be wonderful if all these Linux companies would just sign IP agreements with them. |
| azerthoth Oct 19, 2008 12:20 AM EDT |
TC tell us how you really feel, cant tell from that comment. /sarcasm |
| tracyanne Oct 19, 2008 12:51 AM EDT |
The problem with Microsoft Open Source Software is that it's tied to Microsoft platforms in subtle ways. It often requires Microsoft proprietary technologies in order to function, and I don't necessarily mean that it's written in C# /.NET, if that was all then it wouldn't be a problem. |
| gus3 Oct 19, 2008 3:05 AM EDT |
Didn't the Samba project at one time require statements from its core developers attesting that they had never worked for Microsoft or had access to Microsoft-copyrighted code? |
| hkwint Oct 19, 2008 7:29 AM EDT |
Quoting:"If every effort to license proves not to be fruitful, ultimately we have a responsibility to customers that have licenses and to our shareholders Wow! (The Wow starts now indeed). That statement wipes bottom dude! Let me see... They started these IP claims in 2004, and second half 2008 still sit on their wiped bottom doing exactly nothing but telling 'ultimately' they are going to do something. Let me guess... He uses 'ultimate' like it's used in the naming scheme of Vista, meaning not so ultimate at all; I mean Vista Ultimate users are still waiting for real Ultimate features. My guess is this 'ultimate' has a limit to infinity meaning the end of time. Cool, that gives us plenty of time to have this whole 'IP-system' as a state-issued prohibition on competition > down the drain so Mr. Guitierez can wipe his bottom - once again - with those totally worthless patents MS has. Well, talking this kind of bollocks is another way to don't have to buy toilet paper. |
| Bob_Robertson Oct 19, 2008 11:11 AM EDT |
Microsoft doesn't have any problems with people who write F/OSS software that runs on Windows. Microsoft loves the MIT and BSD licenses, for example. They hardly object to anything written to run on Windows, because it's written to run on WINDOWS! By definition, it's a sale for Microsoft. What Microsoft has a problem with is the GPL. Software written under the GPL is abhorant to Microsoft. The fact that the Linux kernel and much/most distributions of "Linux" uses the GPL is the root of their problem with it. |
| tuxchick Oct 19, 2008 11:35 PM EDT |
azerthoth, I really did exercise some restraint by not using language like "tapeworm" and "maggot." |
| ColonelPanik Oct 19, 2008 11:52 PM EDT |
TC, How long did you study at the Helios School of Charm and Public Speaking? |
| gus3 Oct 20, 2008 1:01 AM EDT |
If memory serves, they are both Texans. |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!