It depends

Story: Red Hat pitching proprietary lock-in as "open"Total Replies: 3
Author Content
tracyanne

Apr 30, 2008
12:21 AM EDT
Does the closed source software use Open protocols or does it use proprietary protocols. If the later then yes vendor lock in is likely.
rijelkentaurus

Apr 30, 2008
2:59 AM EDT
You get locked into a program because of the format of the data, not because of the program. No one would be locked into Microsoft Office if it used a proper ODF format to store data...but it doesn't, and you get stuck because of the format. However, I could ditch OOo easily if I wanted and still have my documents work fine in another program. An open-source program is preferred, but if my data is easily transferable then it's still not a bad program...but the danger always is there that they can change things and screw me over whenever they want.
TxtEdMacs

Apr 30, 2008
6:36 AM EDT
At this stage with the lock in MS holds on mail servers any competition is welcome. Moreover, it is unlikely a group of individuals without significant external funding could create such an application. Hardware requirements alone would preclude most from giving the project a second look.

I find the call for purity a bit suspect. Not too long ago CNet writers were skeptical of Linux, free software and even Open Source (whatever that term means). At the very least, this might be a cheaper option. Furthermore, it might force MS to really secure the IIS server, which has not been of high priority.
dinotrac

Apr 30, 2008
7:15 AM EDT
More viable options = win.

Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]

Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!