Better to maybe have issued a disclaimer
|
Author | Content |
---|---|
vainrveenr Jan 23, 2008 6:51 PM EDT |
Part of Byfield's conclusion could have also served as a disclaimer for his "seven different types of FOSS supporters".Quoting:ConclusionThis is arguably the key part of Byfield's disclaimer, and might have more effectively been part of the introduction so that readers can take his opinion(s) "with a grain of salt", i.e., avoiding the very pigeon-holing of human behavior Byfield launches into. Also, would believe that there is a temporal/situational aspect to Byfield's hard-and-fast FOSS supporter types. As a striking example of this, many FOSS supporters in the past who were so impressed (or borderline-impressed) with Novell and Linspire's FOSS efforts up to November 2006, became quite disenchanted within a relatively short time period afterwards following Microsoft's cloaked anti-FOSS FUD and IP Patent Deals with these two particular companies. This push to the Microsoft-Hating extreme was picked up by SVJN's LW just as on LXer. There are those FOSS-supporting readers of this very thread, who have themselves transformed their FOSS-Supporting Byfield-types either way depending upon recent circumstances(a.k.a., "temptations"). |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!