What changed in OpenSuse license
|
Author | Content |
---|---|
Abe Mar 18, 2007 4:31 PM EDT |
Quoting:The reason for putting out those updated ISOs is a license issue, which had to be addressed. Not that I am interested, but I am curious. The site doesn't elaborate on what change in the license that prompted this update, any one have an idea? |
Sander_Marechal Mar 18, 2007 4:54 PM EDT |
Yeah. There was a font in there that they forgot to add the proper license for. That's all. |
Abe Mar 19, 2007 12:49 PM EDT |
Quoting:Yeah. There was a font in there that they forgot to add the proper license for. That's all. Thanks Sander. But a whole new ISO image was required for a license change? Hard to believe. Do you have a link to read more about it? |
Sander_Marechal Mar 19, 2007 1:02 PM EDT |
Yes, because the license has to be on the CD. The same would apply if the forgotten license was a GPL "license.txt". Oh, and it's only the 2nd CD/DVD of the set taht's affected. The one containing non-FOSS stuff. The FOSS-part (disc 1) is the same. http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-project/2007-03/msg00032.... I came across a better article about it today, but I can't find it ATM. I thought that it was on El Reg, but I can't find it there. |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!