Error in title: Reeks, not Wreaks
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| ccady Feb 01, 2007 10:17 AM EDT |
Error in title: Reeks, not Wreaks |
| herzeleid Feb 01, 2007 10:55 AM EDT |
Your reeking havoc hear. but if their is a better reason for you're usage then the usual, than I will understand. |
| telanoc Feb 01, 2007 11:55 AM EDT |
herzeleid: If your reply was to suggest that ccady is incorrect, then I must suggest that you are incorrect. If you were agreeing instead, then please disregard. :) Reek: to smell badly, or to have an element suggesting something "The kitchen reeked of burnt garlic" "The senators statement reeked of racism" |
| DarrenR114 Feb 01, 2007 12:03 PM EDT |
herzeleid, you apparently forgot the [humor] tag for those of us who are funnily-impaired I figured no one could make that many grammatical errors by accident. |
| tuxchick Feb 01, 2007 12:30 PM EDT |
I no ewe awl are trying to bee funny, but awl of this spell-checker-approved spelling is causing me pane. |
| tuxchick Feb 01, 2007 12:30 PM EDT |
Oh yeah, and it should be "reeks." |
| rht Feb 01, 2007 1:01 PM EDT |
"Oh yeah, and it should be 'reeks.'" Nah, just delete the word "of". |
| herzeleid Feb 01, 2007 2:39 PM EDT |
Apparently my humor was far to suttel for this crowd. I should of made it more blatent. Gosh folks, I was having fun mutilating the english language. 10 points to anyone who corrects all the errors in my 2 posts in this thread. |
| dcparris Feb 01, 2007 3:23 PM EDT |
Newsflash: Editor-in-Chief of popular news site cain't spell worth a hoot! I have to admint, as soon as I saw Scott's e-mail, I felt my face flush 30 shades of red. Duh! And to think my parents wasted all that money on 2 years at a good private school. Sigh! |
| tuxchick Feb 01, 2007 3:33 PM EDT |
wow, two whole years a school! You should be darn near perfect. |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!