Perhaps the NYT and/or CNN reports were more objective
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| TxtEdMacs Feb 26, 2005 3:55 PM EDT |
The stressed points I gathered from those sources was the dreaded letter "E" after the company's trading code. I hope most traders are more informed than I, because I got the impression that it was SCO that decided to change their code, albeit after getting the delisting notice. The ending sentences were the most telling: the March 17 hearing gave SCO at least four more weeks of trading to keep its valuation or even up to six months if a decision can be delayed. Once delisted the stocks lose liquidity and their values drops into the pennies range. |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!