Why Binary-Only Linux Kernel Modules are Illegal

Posted by dcparris on Aug 8, 2006 5:43 AM EDT
Linux DevCenter		Mail this story
Print this story

Rick Moen’s LinuxMafia.com knowledgebase has some great information. I ran across a series of postings the other day that clarified the problem with loadable Linux kernel modules at the GPL. As usual, the dividing line between legal and illegal (or permitted and infringing) rests on the legal definition of a derivative work. The usual “is it linking?” question brought up by the GPL is sort of misleading here. As well, Linus’ policy during the early years of the kernel can be a little confusing.

[...]

I look forward to a Linux kernel copyright holder contacting a blob vendor with this argument. Companies that desire so strongly to “protect [their] valuable intellectual property” might consider respecting the copyright of everyrone who has contributed to the kernel; their argument wears thin by their hypocrisy.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Kernel, Linux

« Return to the newswire homepage

Subject Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
Arugment mis-states nature of a derived work dinotrac 42 1,790 Sep 1, 2006 5:12 AM

You cannot post until you login.