A Blizzard of Motions in Limine in SCO v. Novell

Posted by Scott_Ruecker on Feb 9, 2010 4:49 PM EDT
Groklaw		Mail this story
Print this story

Motions in limine are flying in Utah like snowflakes in a winter storm, filed by both parties in SCO v. Novell. But there are a lot more from Novell than from SCO. Novell has filed 19 more motions in limine, all filed on February 8, for a total of 20, as well as motions for a Daubert hearing to disqualify Dr. Christine A. Botosan, Dr. Gary Pisano, and G. Gervaise Davis III, three of SCO's experts. The Novell motions in limine are mainly to exclude testimony from certain witnesses of SCO's "for lack of personal knowledge," among other reasons. Like Ed Chatlos. Remember when Judge Dale Kimball was on the case, and Novell filed motions to disqualify that same testimony? Well, now they are raising it again.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Groups: SCO, Novell; Story Type: News Story

« Return to the newswire homepage

Subject Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
This is the suit that never ends...... dthacker 3 1,005 Feb 10, 2010 4:02 AM

You cannot post until you login.