What if copyright didn't apply to binary executables?

Posted by Scott_Ruecker on Aug 31, 2008 5:52 PM EDT
Free Software Magazine; By Terry Hancock 		Mail this story
Print this story

By rights, copyright really shouldn’t apply to binary executables, because they are purely “functional” (not “expressive”) works. The decision to extend copyright to binaries was an economically-motivated anomaly, and that choice has some counter-intuitive and detrimental side-effects. What would things in the free software world look like if the courts had decided otherwise? For one thing, the implementation of copyleft would have to be completely different. Hypothetical? Academic? Not if you’re a hardware developer! Because this is exactly what the law does look like for designs for physical hardware (where the product is not protected by copyright).

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story

« Return to the newswire homepage

Subject Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
Code poets jacog 5 1,249 Sep 2, 2008 5:28 AM

You cannot post until you login.